July 7, 2008 6:42 AM PDT

Icahn, Microsoft team up for action on Yahoo

Posted by Dawn Kawamoto
  • Font size
  • Print
Carl Icahn

Update at 3:49 p.m. PDT, with closing stock price and timing of when Icahn expects to file his definitive proxy.

Investor activist Carl Icahn and Microsoft on Monday asked Yahoo investors to oust Yahoo's board and in its place elect Icahn's dissident slate, potentially paving the way for a purchase of the Internet company in its entirety or just its search assets.

Here is part a statement from Icahn, who is running a dissident slate of directors to unseat Yahoo's entire board, that cites discussions with Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer:

Steve made it clear to me that if a new board were elected, he would be interested in discussing a major transaction with Yahoo, such as either a transaction to purchase the "Search" function with large financial guarantees or, in the alternative, purchasing the whole company. He stated that Microsoft would be willing to enter into discussion immediately if the new board that has been nominated were elected. While there can be no assurance of a future transaction, as many of you know, I have negotiated successfully a large number of transactions over the past years. If and when elected, I strongly believe that in very short order the new board would, subject to its fiduciary duties, be presenting to shareholders either a purchase offer for the whole company or a very attractive offer to purchase "Search" with large guarantees.

And for good measure, confirmation came just a few minutes later from Microsoft on those discussions with Icahn. Microsoft has been frustrated so far in its months-long pursuit of Yahoo and not long ago said it was giving up the chase--though apparently not all interest. According to Microsoft:

We confirm, however, that after the shareholder election Microsoft would be interested in discussing with a new board a major transaction with Yahoo, such as either a transaction to purchase the "Search" function with large financial guarantees or, in the alternative, purchasing the whole company.

Shares of Yahoo jumped as high as $24.25 a share during intraday trading, before ending the session at $23.91 a share, up nearly 12 percent.

While Microsoft's announcement that it supports Icahn's efforts potentially gives his proxy battle a bigger stick, it is far from offering any guarantees.

It has yet to be seen whether Microsoft's public statement will be enough to sway investors, absent of any specific price, terms or other details prior to Yahoo's annual shareholders meeting on August 1. Microsoft stated it does not plan to make such information available before the annual meeting.

Advisory services to institutional investors, for example, may be reluctant to recommend support for Icahn's proxy slate, in absence of any details of what Microsoft plans to offer, according to one source with such an advisory service. Institutional advisory services can be influential in proxy battles, given some mutual funds, pension funds, and asset management companies rely on their recommendations to vote on proxy matters.

Microsoft could lend a greater hand to Icahn's proxy battle if it were to go directly to Yahoo's investors with a tender offer and work in tandem with Icahn's proxy battle.

A tender offer could include all the details of a buyout offer and be set to expire sometime after Yahoo's annual shareholders meeting. That would give investors a guarantee a deal was waiting to be done at the end of the day.

Both Microsoft and Icahn note in their statements that there is no guarantee a transaction of any kind will definitely occur, should Icahn's slate be elected.

Meanwhile, one source close to Yahoo said, "If Microsoft was interested in purchasing the company, they should make their proposal public. As recent as a few weeks ago, they weren't willing to enter into discussions at the same price range that they had previously proposed."

Microsoft announced a deal back in February that initially valued Yahoo at $31 a share, and then later bumped it up to $33 a share in May, before walking away after Yahoo countered with $37 a share.

Yahoo, in a statement, responded to comments made by Icahn and Microsoft:

Yahoo's Board of Directors continues to stand ready to enter into negotiations with Microsoft Corporation for an acquisition of Yahoo. Indeed, as recently as June, Yahoo's independent directors and management approached Steve Ballmer about just such a transaction, only to be told that Microsoft was no longer interested even in the price range which they had previously proposed. Now Mr. Ballmer and Mr. Icahn have teamed up in an apparent effort to force Yahoo into selling to Microsoft its Search business at a price to be determined in a future "negotiation" between Mr. Icahn's directors and Microsoft's management. We feel very strongly that this would not lead to an outcome that would be in the best interests of Yahoo's stockholders. If Microsoft and Mr. Ballmer really want to purchase Yahoo, we again invite them to make a proposal immediately. And if Mr. Icahn has an actual plan for Yahoo beyond hoping that Microsoft might actually consummate a deal which they have repeatedly walked away from, we would be very interested in hearing it.

While the statements by both Icahn and Microsoft point to a strong interest in ousting Yahoo's entire board, Icahn has yet to file his definitive proxy, which had been expected to occur before July 4.

The definitive proxy allows him to begin mailing out proxy cards to Yahoo's investors and hit the road with his investor presentation, which would include wooing the institutional investor advisory services.

As a result, it raises questions on whether Icahn is keeping his options open, despite a rapidly narrowing window of time when he has to choose between running a dissident slate with enough candidates to gain control of Yahoo's board, or go for a partial slate that would not constitute a majority on Yahoo's board.

For now, Icahn is planning to run a full slate, according to an interview he gave to the Los Angeles Times.

He noted he expects to make his final decision within days. Said Icahn in the interview with the Los Angeles Times:

We really only have a few days, so probably this will take care of itself.

Nonetheless, the public statements by both Icahn and Microsoft may yet serve as a cattle prod to Yahoo to get it to enter into negotiations to sell just its search business to the software giant at terms both can live with.

Dawn Kawamoto covers enterprise security and financial news relating to technology for CNET News. E-mail Dawn.
Recent posts from News Blog
Was InfoWorld's CTO of the Year award a year late?
VMWare VI4 renamed to vSphere
Red Hat's new support product demonstrates subscription value
Teen listens to iPod during brain tumor removal
NASA, Google Maps track Southern California wildfires
Sprint first to offer HTC Touch Pro
Flipping out: RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 debuts
Sprint HTC Touch Diamond outed early
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 35 comments
by CharlesRovira July 7, 2008 7:29 AM PDT
This may be a time when Icahn and Balmer see a company dissolve rather than give into them.

I predict that, push comes to shove, they'll get to own a company with no employees and nothing that can be done about it.

Yahoo will be a non-functioning shell and Icahn and Balmer will have shelled out for nothing.

They'll back off and then people will be rehired at their pre debacle salaries and pick up the pieces and the judos.
Reply to this comment
by Sumatra-Bosch July 7, 2008 9:24 AM PDT
How right you are. The moment that the Yahoo!s think that these thugs are going to be running their lives is the moment the building will simply empty. If Ballmer is smart, he'll just have Pinkerton send in armed guards ready to clear the place well in advance of any announcement to minimize rage-fueled vandalism by people whose lives will be shattered by Yahoo!'s takeover by this sadistic cult. Still, nothing will stop the Yahoo!s from building, burying and running logic bombs that could detonate 6-24 months out. MSFT should assume the entire infrastructure has been rigged for complete meltdown when they get their hands on it and throw whatever money and third-party talent they think they can buy or trust to ferret out the electronic IEDs that will be waiting for them.
by Tony McCune July 7, 2008 8:24 AM PDT
I commented on this back in May, Google stands to win with any Microhoo deal. The June market share data proved me right.
http://tmccune.blogspot.com/2008/05/google-wins-on-any-microhoo-deal.html
Reply to this comment
by jamalystic July 7, 2008 8:34 AM PDT
Why these acts of desperation by Microsft is any body's guess. It seems from all indication that Microsoft has hinged its online future on the deal with Yahoo. But there are still many viable options available to Microsoft: Why Microsoft Should Forego the Acquisitions Route(http://www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?section_id=625&doc_id=158193&F_src=flftwo)
Reply to this comment
by Dezeit July 7, 2008 8:47 AM PDT
I suspect that no formal offer can be given until they have sorted out the Employee stock automatically maturing on a takeover.

This is the most that Microsoft can do, as soon as the formal offer is made then there is no possibilitiy to get the stock vest overturned, or thats how I read it.
Reply to this comment
by YankeePoodle July 7, 2008 9:03 AM PDT
the garbage you are spewing does not make sense, it is your wishful thinking as a consequence of hate towards microsoft.

True there will be some attrition, but Yahoo! employees are already in the a limbo. A microsoft takeover wont make it any worse.
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto July 7, 2008 9:05 AM PDT
Whee! Here we go again! Watch as speculators drive the YHOO share price through the roof!

Meanwhile, fanboys and astroturfers for MSFT will plop down and praise the attempt to High Heaven.

...and it all boils down to a simple (and holy crap is it obvious) inability of Ballmer to get MSN out of last place, and exemplifies the increasingly desperate floundering of MSFT's strategic plans in general.

/P
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan July 7, 2008 9:59 AM PDT
I don't think Microsoft needs to purchase Yahoo- the way that their CEO is running it now, it's collapsing with the exodus of talent and personnel all escaping his exploits. The stockholders are suing, the company is tanking and has no leadership. Microsoft would be foolish to go after this sinking ship. They can get all they want with separate purchases with other companies, and are in fact doing that now. On the other hand, it's good to see you are still your open minded self. ;)
by Sumatra-Bosch July 7, 2008 11:50 AM PDT
Stop that! You are having too much fun with this! Entirely too much fun!
by Penguinisto July 7, 2008 2:01 PM PDT
"Microsoft would be foolish to go after this sinking ship." Well, MSFT would be foolish twice-over if they got it. Also, consider that they're expending an awful lot of time, energy, and treasure chasing Google, when they should be busy trying to rehabilitate Vista, and looking for ways to out-last the commoditization of operating systems and apps.
by Vegaman_Dan July 7, 2008 5:08 PM PDT
Penguinisto wrote: "Also, consider that they're expending an awful lot of time, energy, and treasure chasing Google, when they should be busy trying to rehabilitate Vista, and looking for ways to out-last the commoditization of operating systems and apps." Oooh, if only you knew- well, your ignorance is charming and fun at least. The NDA will only allow me to say... perhaps Vista is a distraction from something else that is in the wings?
by The_Decider July 8, 2008 10:32 AM PDT
@VegetableHead: So Vista is a pointless pile of crap you say? It is only a distraction? That is quite an expensive and flawed distraction. I suppose you think that people will be happy that they wasted money of a distraction and will happily jump over to whatever pile of feces you are alluding to? Thank you for showing us, yet again, your idiocy and reinforcing that you are an technically ignorant shill. We all know you are a shill and a retard, there is no need to constantly remind us of that fact.
by YankeePoodle July 7, 2008 9:07 AM PDT
Microsoft is determined to be No.2 in search. It is a great gambit for Yahoo! and Microsoft to have a fighting chance against Google. The insane hatred of Jerry Yang towards Microsoft has hurt many including his own workers. Yahoo! and Microsoft should join forces to make a alternate search possible and worthwhile.

Google is a different beast, but for now all microsoft wants is to keep Google in it sights and make search more competetive so that Google does not encroach Microsoft's terrain.
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto July 7, 2008 9:23 AM PDT
"It is a great gambit for Yahoo! and Microsoft to have a fighting chance against Google." Err, they'd still be #2 combined, and by a huge margin. The reasons why MSFT isn't #1 would simply be amplified, and would likely drive hordes of Yahoo-loyal users to Google, making Google an even larger competitor. Also, Yahoo doesn't have to join forces with MSFT for any reason - they're still experiencing decent growth all by themselves.


Meanwhile, MSFT is only worried about google because Google represents the future (where the WWW is the focus), while MSFT represents the past (where the OS and business apps were the center of the universe).
by YankeePoodle July 7, 2008 3:24 PM PDT
Penguinisto,

OS is not really outdated, if you truly believe that, convince your Linux comrades to stop developing the GNU\Linux, the world does not need another operating system.. right? Put your money where your mouth is.

Google does not represent anything, they are rival monopoly. Microsoft is very uncomfortable having another 800-pound Gorilla around. Sooner or later there is going to be an alternative to internet search and having some semblance of competition is good for advertisers and users.

I love Google, i use their search, mail and other interesting applications. Google is a fallable company too, look at Google Checkout? Froogle?. The only thing going for Google is their search.

Yahoo is has done miserable over the years, after great promising start they are somehow caught up in a dilemma of deciding whether wanting to a tech company or content company. Microsoft would provide the sense of direction back to Yahoo certainly the alliance will have more to gain from than to lose.

I want this merger to happen, because the world is unsafe place with only one decent search engine.
by Penguinisto July 7, 2008 4:31 PM PDT
I didn't say outdated - I would say that the OS has become a commodity; there's no potential for growth there if you're trying to make a living off of a proprietary version of it. Apple knows this, which is why they're smart enough to sell computers, not operating systems. The Linux community knows this, which is why Linux-oriented corps (including IBM) focus on selling services, not the product itself. You also discount the fact that while Linux (as a community) has one big non-fiduciary goal for working on it (software freedom), MSFT has no other goal than to make money from the product. ---------- Yep, Google is fallible, but they win more often than they lose... something MSFT used to be able to claim. Google has a future, and is rapidly pushing towards it. MSFT is trying to get there, but at the same time tries to keep one foot in the past... as Vista has proven, the results are ugly at best. ------ "I want this merger to happen, because the world is unsafe place with only one decent search engine." so turning three search engines into two would reach that goal... how? If MSN/Live was so popular, then why does it lag even though it's the default on Windows?
by mgarfein July 7, 2008 9:50 AM PDT
Why does Msft keep pursuing Yahoo? Too much for too little s far as I'm concerned.
Also, am I the only one that thinks Msft should break up? I think that the nod towards Msft based platforms does more harm than good for their internet strategies.
Reply to this comment
by GadgetDon July 7, 2008 11:29 AM PDT
There's one thing still missing from Icahn's plans. What is his Plan B? Assume he takes over, what's his option to selling?

Even if the final result is selling, the lack of a Plan B means that in the negotiation, Microsoft holds all the cards. They can make an offer for $25/share, and Icahn will have no options.

And the thing is, Icahn knows this, or ought to. He's done enough deals to know what happens when one side can walk away from the negotiating table but the other side can't. He's probably been in deals where he's be the one who can walk away. And he probably did the "rational" thing of grabbing them where it hurts and squeezing. The only way this makes sense is if he's got a deal in his back pocket from Balmer, they've already agreed to a number. But even then, he's a fool...what are his guarantees that Microsoft will keep to it.
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto July 7, 2008 4:42 PM PDT
I'm thinking that Icahn and MSFT have an 'understanding', in that when/if MSFT does gobble up shares, MSFT will either pay Icahn a premium for his, or Icahn gets enough to exert some control over Yahoo, until he strips and salvages whatever parts of it that MSFT doesn't purchase.
by Vegaman_Dan July 7, 2008 5:10 PM PDT
At this point, it's clear there is a 'plan' in the works, but if MS decdied to back away from this deal as well, Yahoo could be in a serious bad position- not that they are doing so well now, of course. I would look more towards NEWS.COM and MSFT possibly buying up Yahoo and parting it out with Search going to MS and the rest / content going to News.com. But all of this is guesswork- nobody, and I mean nobody- here has any real knowledge of what is going on. It's all speculation.
by kpepps17 July 7, 2008 11:56 AM PDT
If Yahoo sells, I will not use it anymore. I don't know maybe I will. I do not see good things for yahoo in the future. Smells like a pump and dump to me. Kind a like one hand milking a bull and the other holding the sieve.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan July 7, 2008 5:14 PM PDT
I'd have to start using it to drop it. I mean, there obviously must be people who use it, but I can't seem to find anyone. Portal sites like this and AOL seem to be left back in the 90's.
by JCPayne July 7, 2008 12:23 PM PDT
Microsoft is NOTHING without Yahoo so they need this or else.
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto July 7, 2008 4:33 PM PDT
...or else what? To be honest, if MSFT would actually, you know, innovate (like they claim to), they could have easily surpassed Google by now. They do after all have the installed base and the ability to embrace/extend/extinguish its competitors... if only they could figure out how to do it in any market that doesn't involve the ability to strong-arm OEM's, anyway...
by Reallyeh July 7, 2008 1:24 PM PDT
Carl Icahn is a business bully out to make money only for himself and rip up the company until there is nothing left. He uses the proxy battles as he has done in many other dealings to force a company to a buy out, and does not care about the end result because he makes the $$$$. And we know all about Microsoft's dealings they seem to be the perfect pair ready to destroy and a great Internet company. I think Yahoo's tough stance is AWESOME and hope they fight to the bitter end so they don't end up like one of Carl Icahn's destroyed companies such as TWA. Google, continue to help Yahoo, they need all the muscle against these bullies!!
Reply to this comment
by YankeePoodle July 7, 2008 3:16 PM PDT
Everyone needs a savior and dont blame Yahoo shareholders for finding one in Carl Icahn. It is Jerry Yang who brought this on to himself.
by Penguinisto July 7, 2008 4:34 PM PDT
Shareholders, or Speculators? Shareholders are usually smart enough to not sacrifice long-term growth for short-term profit bumps. ;)
by Vegaman_Dan July 7, 2008 5:24 PM PDT
Penguinisto wrote: "Shareholders, or Speculators? Shareholders are usually smart enough to not sacrifice long-term growth for short-term profit bumps. " This is true, but considering the stock's long term value hasn't kept up with the industry, investing in this company is a poor choice. I think the stock holders can see a profit to be made before the company is either bought out or continues in its downward death spiral. There is a proper time to buy and to sell. It's pretty clear this stock isn't going to be around for the long term, so I can't really blame stock holders wanting to get what they can for it.
by open-mind July 7, 2008 3:13 PM PDT
On the down side ... if this deal goes through, it means the destruction of Yahoo as we know it today. And that's kind of sad.



On the plus side ... if this deal goes through, Microsoft will begin to flounder sooner, since most of their cash and resources will be absorbed by this boondoggle. As a result, the Fortune-100 (where I work) will more quickly consider alternatives like Linux and OS X for the desktop. Unfortunately, right now, we're still mired in the Windows-only mandate-muck of ten years ago.



So the selfish part of me hopes this deal will go through.
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto July 7, 2008 4:37 PM PDT
I'm actually happy either way. If MSFT buys it, they'll sink. If they don't, I know that MSFT is still stuck in a dilemma that is slowly rendering them irrelevant, and that Ballmer is stoo drop-stupid to be able to rectify that. (I doubt that Gates could do it, to be honest... it's a whole different paradigm than any one that either of them would be familiar with.)
by Vegaman_Dan July 7, 2008 5:26 PM PDT
Interesting comments. Ignorant ones when faced with the reality of the situation and facts before us, but interesting none the less. On a sdie note, how did you get paragraphs to work with this thrice-damned horrible commenting system CNET has adopted?
by open-mind July 7, 2008 9:03 PM PDT
Dan, at least we agree that CNET's new weblog app sux rocks. I thought the old one was bad until using this. Anyway, to get the paragraphs, I've just been putting two HTML break tags (br) in line with my comments. Paragraph (p) tags might work too. Let's see...


It worked if this displays as a new paragraph.

by jmdunys July 8, 2008 3:02 AM PDT
Microsoft BADLY want the Zimbra team. Isn't it interesting that the Zimbra boss now in charge of Zimbra AND IM is talking about IM interoperability?


Search is the red herring that Microsoft want everybody to follow. If they wanted it THAT much, why didn't they bump up the price a little just for the search business?


If the deal go through, I see a new hotmail/yahoo-mail based on Zimbra backend. I see a retooling of Exchange Server using Zimbra technology. I see a new built-in email and calendar app in Windows 7 based on the Zimbra client - pre-configured for the new hotmail. I see Microsoft getting partners to build widgets and extensions to their new Exchange system
Reply to this comment
by The_Decider July 8, 2008 10:36 AM PDT
Icahn is a destroyer looking for a fast buck, regardless of the carnage it creates. Microsoft is just a dinosaur who hasn't figured out their time is over. They just know they need to compete with this Google thing, but don't understand why or how. The only possible result is that Google will be stronger and there will be less competition. Oh, and Microsoft will still have no clue what to do with all that code from Yahoo because everyone left MicroHoo because no one with talent wants to work for the mind-numbing borg.
Reply to this comment
by df561 July 9, 2008 8:15 AM PDT
lol why does everyone give Google so much credit, they have exactly 1 successful product, and their brand does not scale to anything beyond search. Google's only hope for the future is to use all that wealth and become an ISP
Reply to this comment
 See all 35 Comments >>
advertisement

In the news now

Yahoo's Decker strong contender for CEO

Sources say the president of the embattled Internet search pioneer has been through two rounds of interviews with the board.


Gadget extravaganza in Las Vegas

CES 2009 is in full swing. Highlights so far include Palm's WebOS and Pre device, Microsoft's Windows 7 beta, and much more.


About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

News Blog topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right